ALJ Excepted from Competitive Service


Executive Order Excepting Administrative Law Judges
from the Competitive Service

Nicole Schultheis, J.D. Senior ALJ Consultant, Writer and Author
July 12, 2018


Attention Administrative Law Judge candidates:

As of July 10, 2018, every federal agency that hires Administrative Law Judges must use its own process for selecting qualified candidates.


In the wake of Lucia et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, President Trump signed an Executive Order Tuesday which abolishes the competitive hiring of ALJs and does away with OPM’s competitive exam and register: OPM’s latest round of exams and structured interviews were completed just last month, before Lucia was decided. As far as we know, no 2017 ALJ candidates have been notified regarding the outcome of their structured interview or proctored exam.

However, as we read the Supreme Court’s opinion and Tuesday’s Executive Order, OPM no longer has the authority to screen or competitively rate these candidates or even maintain its current ALJ register.

The President’s EO is good news for those fed up with the ALJ exam, the scoring process, and the endless waiting to be put on a cert list by OPM so that they can be selected for hire. Many highly qualified candidates – including a number of sitting trial court and administrative law judges in their home states-have criticized OPM’s inability to screen their credentials properly and indeed the entire ALJ exam process. These candidates can now be evaluated directly by the hiring agency, much as attorneys are, as “Excepted Service” hires.

From now on, if you want to be an ALJ for the Department of Labor (41 ALJs as of 2017) or the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (101 ALJs as of 2017), you can apply there directly, if and when there is an opening, rather than endure OPM’s onerous process that, if it leads anywhere, most likely lands you an offer to hear Social Security cases instead. (A complete listing of agencies that hire their own ALJ can be found here.)

At least one big issue remains. Per the Supreme Court, ALJs are considered “inferior officers” of the United States who can be appointed only by the President or the head hiring agency. However, in Lucia, the Court declined to accept the government’s request to decide if or how the President or agency head can remove ALJs, once appointed. Whether ALJs can now be fired or sanctioned for failing to do as they are told, in light of the Administrative Procedure Act, not to mention due process, is unclear.* Fresh constitutional challenges are already being formulated.

As we write to you today, relevant OPM and SSA web pages have not changed. But keep an eye out for updates here and here. We’ll keep you posted, too.

*Neither Lucia nor this EO affect the hiring of Immigration Judges (IJs). The Department of Justice/Executive Office for Immigration Review hires hundreds of IJs who serve at the pleasure of the Attorney General. For example, these candidates have been asked, during the interview process, how they would respond, in deciding a case before them, if the Attorney General issued an order they disagreed with. In comparison, as of March 2017, EOIR had but one ALJ. EOIR’s ALJs hear only a limited category of cases, under a statute that governs the employment of aliens.

Updates:
7/12: Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

7/11: Democrats, Advocacy Groups Pan Order Moving Administrative Judges Out of Competitive Service

7/5: OPM on Executive Orders – OPM Issues Guidance on Executive Orders, But Many Questions Remain


Article author: Nicole Schultheis

Since 2010, Maryland attorney Nicole Schultheis has supported candidates seeking to become Administrative Law Judges, Immigration Judges, Administrative Judges, and Administrative Patent Judges. She has taught resume writing to aspiring legal candidates and others at numerous Federal agencies, successfully helping those seeking executive leadership roles at the Department of Justice and its components, as well as agencies across the Executive Branch. For more than 25 years, Nicole led her own law firm in Baltimore, Maryland before her focus shifted to teaching, writing, and professional mentorship.


The Resume Place coaches, instructs, reviews and provides consulting, writing and editorial services for aspiring SES members who are writing their ECQs. RP teaches ECQ Writing in many government agencies, especially for Leadership Development Programs. Our book, The New SES Application, gives examples, definitions and insight for writing the ECQs. Nicole Schultheis is our lead SES writer with many years of expertise writing successful ECQs on behalf of applicants and agency selectees across government.


The ALJ Writing Guide includes: samples of attorney federal resumes; definitions of the 13 ALJ Core Competencies (which are useful for any attorney federal resume); example of the narratives for the former ALJ application (Litigation and Administration); and a great example of a Case List. All of this information is helpful for writing an Attorney-Advisor or US States Attorney, or Immigration Judge Federal Resume.

Purchase a PDF download or Print Book, $49.95


Attorney Federal Resume Samples, Legal Competency Definitions, Case List, Samples of Narratives.

ALJ Writing Guide (also works for IJ and other attorney federal resume applications).

Order Now


How to Get Help with Your ALJ / IJ / Attorney-Advisor Federal Resumes for Excepted Service Positions

The Resume Place can consult, edit, review and write your federal resume for the above positions. Request Consultation about your ALJ, IJ, US Attorney, or Attorney-Advisor Federal resumes.

Please request a quote here


Get Federal Resume Help!
Our FREE newsletter gives you awesome advice on writing your best federal resume and mastering the USAJOBS application.
Sign up now!